Seven questions. And three titles each time. On re-use.

Re-attitude / re-position / re-practice
Can – or rather, must – re-use not primarily be a matter of re-attitude? Of re-position? Of re-practice – architectural practice in particular? In other words: can today’s practice simply remain as it is? Or must it first question its own position? Dare to revise its attitude? Is what today’s practice stands for still sufficient? Shouldn’t tomorrow’s practice dare to question what is being asked of it? So that what is expected of re-use – the brief – might turn out differently than expected? Simply practise differently. Certainly!