While architecture transcends the ages, the same cannot be said of its practices, which are constantly evolving with the times. The contemporary period and its challenges are prompting architects to develop new skills that are both parallel to and at odds with the norms of the profession. Among these, political engagement seems to stand out. This article offers an investigation into the urban struggles of yesterday and today: how is this new generation of architects getting involved? For what are the differences and similarities between outdoor swimming made possible by Pool is Cool, a guided walk by Architecture that de-genders, and an information campaign on the social networks of Belgian Architects United?

For researcher Isabelle Doucet, the engagement of Brussels architects is an important feature of the Belgian architectural landscape. It originated in the violent modernisation that the capital underwent from the late 1960s onwards, which led to successive waves of struggles to defend everyone’s right to the city. The Battle of the Marolles, the protests against the destruction of the Northern Quarter and against the transformation of the Leopold Quarter into the European Quarter are among the most notable examples. At the time, these movements were accompanied and supported by the creation of organisations such as the Atelier de recherche et d’action urbaines (ARAU, 1969), Inter-Environnement Bruxelles (IEB) and BRAL (1974), whose ambition was to support citizens’ struggles and bring them together to give them more strength. These groups did not hesitate to organise press conferences, block construction sites or participate in consultation committees. Architects take part in these actions, putting their expertise at the service of the cause. Brussels is therefore, historically, a place where people campaign for the common right to the city.